Comparison between cellulose acetate membrane and polycarbonate membrane for the measurements of nutrients and chlorophyll <i>a</i>

ZHANG Yun-yan; LIU Su-mei; SONG Guo-dong

doi:10.13634/j.cnki.mes20160621

Volume 35 Issue 6

Jan. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE > 2016 > 35(6): 932-937. > DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20160621

ZHANG Yun-yan, LIU Su-mei, SONG Guo-dong. Comparison between cellulose acetate membrane and polycarbonate membrane for the measurements of nutrients and chlorophyll a[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 35(6): 932-937. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20160621

Citation:

PDF (2283 KB)

Comparison between cellulose acetate membrane and polycarbonate membrane for the measurements of nutrients and chlorophyll a

ZHANG Yun-yan^{1, 2,},
LIU Su-mei^{1, 2, ,},
SONG Guo-dong^{1, 2}

1.
Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China; Qingdao collaborative innovation center of marine science and technology, Qingdao 266100, China
2.
Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266100, China

More Information

Received Date: January 26, 2016
Revised Date: April 10, 2016

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

In this study, cellulose acetate membrane (0.45 μm) and polycarbonate membrane (0.4 μm) were compared by measuring nutrients in filtrates and chlorophyll a on the filters to explore the differences.Undried cellulose acetate membrane and polycarbonate membrane were both suitable for nutrients measurement with consistent results:there were no significant differences in nitrite, ammonium, dissolved phosphate and dissolved silicate between cellulose acetate membrane and polycarbonate membrane.The difference between these two membranes in nitrate was less than 2%.Dried cellulose acetate membrane introduced more ammonium to seawater samples due to the slow filtration rate.Polycarbonate membrane was more suitable for the determination of chlorophyll a.The retention efficiency of cellulose acetate membrane tends to be lower since it cannot retain the pico-phytoplankton completely.
- cellulose acetate membrane,
- polycarbonate membrane,
- nutrients,
- chlorophyll a

FullText(HTML)

References (19)

References

[1]	JOHNSTONE R, PRESTON M.Nutrient analysis in tropical marine waters:practical guidance and safety notes for the performance of dissolved micronutrient analysis in sea water with particular reference to tropical waters[R].Intergovermental Oceanographic Commission, 1993:5-8.
[2]	MARVIN K T, PROCTORJR R R, NEAL R A.Some effects of filtration on the determination of nutrients in fresh and salt water[J].Limnology and Oceanography, 1972, 17(5):777-784. doi: 10.4319/lo.1972.17.5.0777
[3]	尹相淳.测定海水中的氮化合物时, 对浑浊水样过滤及试剂空白测定的初步研究[J].黄渤海海洋, 1985, 3(2):67-73. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBHH198502013.htm
[4]	RILEY J P, SKIRROW G.Chemical oceanography[M].New York, London:Academic Press, 1983:193-514.
[5]	GB/T12763-2007, 海洋调查规范[S].
[6]	GRASSHOFF K, EHRHARDT M, KREMLING F.Methods of seawater analysis[M].3rd ed.Weinheim:Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 1999:27-228.
[7]	LIU S M, LI R H, ZHANG G L, et al.The impact of anthropogenic activities on nutrient dynamics in the tropical Wenchanghe and Wenjiaohe Estuary and Lagoon system in East Hainan, China[J].MarineChemistry, 2011, 125(1/2/3/4):49-68. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rui_Li93/publication/251563282_The_impact_of_anthropogenic_activities_on_nutrient_dynamics_in_the_tropical_Wenchanghe_and_Wenjiaohe_Estuary_and_Lagoon_system_in_East_Hainan_China/links/578b1c1308ae5c86c99e4287.pdf?origin=publication_list
[8]	高凤鸣, 张淑华, 汪心源, 等.用次溴酸钠氧化法测定海水中氨氮的研究[J].海洋湖沼通报, 1980, 41(4):41-47. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYFB198004007.htm
[9]	PARSONS T R, MAITA Y, LALLI C M.A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis[M].Oxford:Pergamon Press, 1984:107-173.
[10]	汪锰, 王湛, 李政雄.膜材料及其制备[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2003:49-252.
[11]	崔浣华, 王世成, 吴日升, 等.核径迹微孔滤膜的制备及其在水样分析中的应用[J].核技术, 1985, 8(4):41. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJSU198504041.htm
[12]	AMINOT A, KIRKWOOD D S, KÉROUEL R.Determination of ammonia in seawater by the indophenol-blue method:evaluation of the ICES NUTS I/C 5 questionnaire[J].Marine Chemistry, 1997, 56(1/2):59-75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223259177_Determination_of_ammonia_in_seawater_by_the_indophenol-blue_method_Evaluation_of_the_ICES_NUTS_IC_5_questionnaire
[13]	宁志铭, 刘素美, 任景玲.铵氮不同分析方法的对比[J].海洋环境科学, 2013, 32(5):763-766. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYHJ201305026.htm
[14]	SPARROW S D, MASIAK D T.Errors inanalyses for ammonium and nitrate caused by contamination from filter papers[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1987, 51(1):107-110. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100010023x
[15]	丛丕福, 牛铮, 蒙继华, 等.1998~2003年卫星反演的中国陆架海叶绿素a浓度变化分析[J].海洋环境科学, 2006, 25(1):30-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYHJ200601008.htm
[16]	DICKSON M L, WHEELER P A.Chlorophyll a concentrations in the North Pacific:does a latitudinal gradient exist?[J].Limnology and Oceanography, 1993, 38(8):1813-1818. doi: 10.4319/lo.1993.38.8.1813
[17]	宁修仁.几种不同类型的滤膜对叶绿素a荧光测定的影响[J].海洋学报, 1983, 5(2):254-256. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SEAC198302014.htm
[18]	KNEFELKAMP B, CARSTENS K, WILTSHIRE K H.Comparison of different filter types onchlorophyll-a retention and nutrient measurements[J].Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2007, 345(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.01.008
[19]	焦念志, 杨燕辉.中国海原绿球藻研究[J].科学通报, 2002, 47(7):485-491. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB200207001.htm

[1]	WANG Lin, MENG Qing-hui, MA Yu-juan, WANG Xiang, WANG Xin-xin, CHEN Yan-long. Retrieval of chlorophyll a concentration from Sentinel-2 MSI image in Qinhuangdao coastal area[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 42(2): 309-314. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.2022-x-0263
[2]	FANG Cao, NING Zhi-ming, WEI Fen, XIA Rong-lin, YANG Bin. Key factors affecting the concentrations and structures of nutrients around Weizhou island based on the LOICZ model[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(5): 689-696. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20210040
[3]	MA Ben, ZHAO Hui. Distribution characteristics of chlorophyll a and nutrients in the Pearl River Estuary in summer and their relationship with environmental factors[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 40(5): 707-716. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200244
[4]	LIU Xi-han, WANG Yu-jue, SHI Ya-jun, LIU Dong-yan, WANG Yan-xia, TIAN Hai-lan, CHENG Lin. Spatial and temporal distribution of nutrients and chlorophyll a, and their influential factors in Caofeidian coastal waters[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 39(1): 89-98. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes20200113
[5]	WANG Shuang, MA An-qing, HU Juan, HOU Lin-lin, XU Jian-qiang. Comparative study on remote sensing inversional model of chlorophyll-a concentration in semi-closed bay——A Case study in the Jiaozhou bay[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 38(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes20190112
[6]	MO Yu, LONG Han, LAN Wen-lu, XU Song-li, LI Tian-shen. Distribution of size-fractional Chlorophyll a and its controlling factors during dry and wet seasons in Qinzhou bay[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(3): 434-440. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170318
[7]	YUAN Chao, XU Zong-jun, ZHANG Xue-lei, WANG Zong-ling. Seasonal changes of Chlorophyll a and size structure in Shengzhen bay from November 2010 to August 2011[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 35(6): 888-893. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20160614
[8]	LAI Jun-xiang, QIN Xian-ling, JIANG Fa-jun, XU Ming-ben, ZHANG Rong-can, LU Jia-chang. Distribution of size-fractionated Chlorophyll a and its controlling factors in the surface waters of Qinzhou bay[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 35(5): 685-691. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20160508
[9]	XU Shi-guo, FU Yan-zhao, KANG Ping-ping. Seasonal and interannual variations of Chlorophyll a in Bohai Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 34(6): 898-903,924. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes.2015.06.016
[10]	ZHOU Feng-xia, GAO Xue-lu, ZHUANG Wen, ZHANG Jin-feng, LI Pei-miao. The impact of rivers on the Chl a concentrations in coastal surface waters of the Laizhou Bay[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 34(2): 184-189. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes.2015.02.005

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

1.	任和. 两种反渗透膜对海水中营养盐测定结果的影响. 环境科学导刊. 2022(03): 9-12 .
2.	申钊颖，弓晓峰，江良，章绍康，易佳璐，袁少芬. 不同条件对湿地土壤溶解性有机质提取的影响. 环境污染与防治. 2020(01): 39-43 .
3.	张红梅，刘素美，宋国栋，丁帅. 河水溶解无机营养盐样品保存与过滤方式对其测定的影响：以黄河水为例. 海洋环境科学. 2020(04): 638-645 . 本站查看

Other cited types(4)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (2777) PDF downloads (52) Cited by(7)

Comparison between cellulose acetate membrane and polycarbonate membrane for the measurements of nutrients and chlorophyll a

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(4)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Comparison between cellulose acetate membrane and polycarbonate membrane for the measurements of nutrients and chlorophyll a

Abstract

References

Related Articles

Cited by

Periodical cited type(3)

Other cited types(4)

Catalog

Article Metrics

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content