• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • ISSN 1007-6336
  • CN 21-1168/X
ZHOU Gang, LI Jing-mei. Impact assessment of the Ulva Prolifera disaster to the non-use value of coastal tourism resources based on dichotomous questionnaire[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 38(3): 335-341. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes20190303
Citation: ZHOU Gang, LI Jing-mei. Impact assessment of the Ulva Prolifera disaster to the non-use value of coastal tourism resources based on dichotomous questionnaire[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 38(3): 335-341. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes20190303

Impact assessment of the Ulva Prolifera disaster to the non-use value of coastal tourism resources based on dichotomous questionnaire

More Information
  • Received Date: November 15, 2017
  • Revised Date: February 25, 2018
  • Algae blooms disaster has had a considerable impact on the socio-economic aspects of the coastal areas.Among them, the impact of coastal tourism economy and the impact of landscape resources, part of the impact of non-use value, cannot be directly evaluated from the market assessment.In the evaluation method of non-market value, condition evaluation method (CVM) is the one that most widely used.The method CVM collects the information of the respondents through the social survey and collects the questionnaire, and then evaluates the target resource value.In this paper, we use the dichotomous questionnaires to investigate the willingness of tourists to pay for the coastal landscape improving during the period of Ulva prolifera(a green tide).The binary choice model (logit regression model) tries to carry out the impact of the Ulva prolifera disaster on the non-use value of coastal tourism resources in Qingdao.This paper evaluates the general scope of the impact of the Ulva prolifera disaster on the value of coastal tourism resources in an intuitive way.In addition, this research, as a supplement to the socio-economic impact assessment methods and contents of the coastal algae disaster, provides the decision-making basis for the disaster and economic impact of the government and related organizations in the prevention, management and emergency decision-making of seaweed disasters and then help them to make decisions more reasonable and efficient.

  • [1]
    ANDERSON D M, CEMBELLA A D, HALLEGRAEFF G M.Physiological ecology of harmful algal blooms[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 1998.
    [2]
    周罡.近海藻华灾害对渔业直接经济损失评估方法研究[J].中国渔业经济, 2015, 33(5):107-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-590X.2015.05.016
    [3]
    雷亮, 李京梅.浒苔对胶州湾海域休闲娱乐功能的损害评估[J].海洋开发与管理, 2016, 33(9):65-69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2016.09.013
    [4]
    HANLEY N, SHOGREN J F, WHITE B.Environmental economics in theory and practice[M]. London:Macmillan Press, 1997.
    [5]
    佟蒙蒙.我国赤潮的分型分级及赤潮灾害评估体系[D].广州: 暨南大学, 2006. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10559-2007044235.htm
    [6]
    庄大昌, 董明辉.资源与环境经济学国内外研究综述[J].湖南文理学院学报:社会科学版, 2005, 30(1):52-56. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hnwlxyxb-shkx200501014
    [7]
    张志强, 徐中民, 程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J].地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3):454-463. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2003.03.020
    [8]
    HAAB T C, WHITEHEAD J C.Environmental and natural resource economics:an encyclopedia[M]. Santa Barbara, CA:Greenwood Publishing Group Inc, 2016:398-399
    [9]
    焦扬, 敖长林.CVM方法在生态环境价值评估应用中的研究进展[J].东北农业大学学报, 2008, 39(5):131-136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9369.2008.05.030
    [10]
    MITCHELL R C, CARSON R T.Using surveys to value public goods:the contingent valuation method[M]. Washington DC:Resources for the Future Press, 1989:72.
    [11]
    AMIRAN E Y, HAGEN D A.Willingness to pay and willingness to accept:how much can they differ? Comment[J]. The American Economic Review, 2003, 93(1):458-463. doi: 10.1257/000282803321455430
    [12]
    BISHOP R C, HEBERLEIN T A.Measuring values of extramarket goods:are indirect measures biased?[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61(5):926-930. doi: 10.2307/3180348
    [13]
    HANEMANN W M.Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discreteresponses[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984, 66(3):332-341. doi: 10.2307/1240800
    [14]
    MITCHELL R C, CARSON R T.Using surveys to value public goods:the contingent valuation method[M]. Washington DC:Resources for the Future, 1989.
    [15]
    陈强.高级计量经济学及Stata应用[M]. 2版.北京:高等教育出版社, 2014:90-91.
    [16]
    LEE L F.Identification and estimation in binary choice models with limited (censored) dependent variables[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(4):977-996. doi: 10.2307/1914142
    [17]
    于仁成, 刘东艳.我国近海藻华灾害现状、演变趋势与应对策略[J].中国科学院院刊, 2016, 31(10):1167-1174. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkxyyk201610005
    [18]
    WILSON A R.Contingent valuation:not an appropriate valuation tool[J]. The Appraisal Journal, 2006:74(1):53-61, 55.
  • Related Articles

    [1]FANG Cao, NING Zhi-ming, WEI Fen, XIA Rong-lin, YANG Bin. Key factors affecting the concentrations and structures of nutrients around Weizhou island based on the LOICZ model[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(5): 689-696. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20210040
    [2]ZHANG Xue-wei, HAN Zhen. Prediction and analysis of Argo temperature data by ConvGRU model[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(4): 628-635. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20210054
    [3]TIAN Li-na, YANG Jin-sheng, ZHOU You-lin, CAO Rui, ZHANG Meng, PAN Yu-ying. The primary study on antioxidase activities of Boleophthalmus pectinirostris exposed to crude oil in intertidal zone[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(1): 135-141. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200170
    [4]ZHAO Xin, WANG Xiao-han, ZHENG Hui. Measurement on the risk value of storm surge disaster with POT loss distribution fitting model[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 37(5): 773-779. DOI: 10.12111/j.cnki.mes20180522
    [5]GOU Lu-feng, WANG Yan-tao, JIN Wei-bo. Empirical study about the carrying capacity evaluation of marine resources and environment based on the entropy-weight TOPSIS model[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 37(4): 586-594. DOI: 10.12111/j.cnki.mes20180416
    [6]LIN Yu-fei, YANG Yang, WANG Guo-shan, MA Li, GAO Xiang, ZHOU Yuan-yuan. Establishment of the losses investigation and assessment method of green tide (Ulva prolifera) disaster[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 37(3): 452-456. DOI: 10.12111/j.cnki.mes20180322
    [7]ZHANG Xin-xin, YIN Yue, DUAN Mei-na, WANG Chao, XIONG De-qi. Effect of bioremediation dispersant and 180# fuel oil on CAT and SOD in Glyptocidaris crenularis[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(2): 284-290. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170220
    [8]QIAO Ling, ZHEN Yu, MI Tie-Zhu. Review of the brown tides caused by Aureococcus anophagefferens[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 35(3): 473-480. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20160324
    [9]LI Lei, JIANG Mei, SHEN Xin-qiang, WANG Yun-long, WU Qing-yuan, NIU Jun-xiang, XU Gao-peng. Effects of Cr(VI) on the activities of SOD,concentration of MDA and MTs inhepatopancreas and gilltsissue of Portunus trituberculatus[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 34(6): 838-843. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes.2015.06.007
    [10]LI Lei, JIANG Mei, SHEN Xin-qiang, WANG Yun-long, WU Qing-yuan, NIU Jun-xiang, XU Gao-peng. Effects of benzo[a]pyrene exposure on biomarkers in Exopalaemon carinicauda liver[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2015, 34(4): 513-518. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes.2015.04.007
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 李興来,肖景义. 青海祁连风光游憩区生态系统服务价值评估. 生态科学. 2022(02): 124-130 .
    2. 陈金叶,余智涵,郑彬. 旅游业创业板与主板上市公司财务指标分析与对比. 中国林业经济. 2020(01): 128-131 .
    3. 王少安,邢夫敏. G60科创走廊4A、5A级旅游景区分布格局及影响因素研究. 江苏商论. 2020(02): 69-74+79 .
    4. 许瑞恒,林欣月,姜旭朝. 海洋生态补偿研究动态综述. 生态经济. 2020(07): 147-153 .
    5. 刘佳,王焕真,范阿蕾,亓颖. 滨海旅游环境治理公众参与机制研究——以青岛浒苔损害为例. 海洋湖沼通报. 2020(05): 56-65 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2450) PDF downloads (30) Cited by(11)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return