• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CSCD
  • ISSN 1007-6336
  • CN 21-1168/X
FU Yuan-yuan, YANG Chao, YAO Yuan, ZHANG Hao-nan, ZHAO Qian-qian. Analysis of sea wave characteristics at Qinhuangdao station[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(6): 842-846. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.2022-x-0101
Citation: FU Yuan-yuan, YANG Chao, YAO Yuan, ZHANG Hao-nan, ZHAO Qian-qian. Analysis of sea wave characteristics at Qinhuangdao station[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(6): 842-846. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.2022-x-0101

Analysis of sea wave characteristics at Qinhuangdao station

More Information
  • Received Date: April 24, 2022
  • Revised Date: June 21, 2022
  • Accepted Date: June 07, 2022
  • Based on the sea wave observation data of Qinhuangdao Ocean Station from March 2015 to November 2020, this paper analyzes the wave characteristics of Qinhuangdao in spring, summer and autumn. The results show that the wave type of waves in different months and years are roughly the same. There are only two types of waves, mainly wind waves (F), with a probability of more than 90%, and mixed waves-surges (U/F) appearing less frequently. The sea situation is between level 1~6, with level 2 and 3 as the main, level 4 as a supplement, level 1 second, and level 5 and 6 occasionally occur. The months when Grade 6 sea situation appear are July and August. In spring (March to May), the sea situation is mainly grade 3, and in autumn (September to November), the sea situation is mainly grade 2 to 3, showing obvious seasonality. The years when Grade 6 sea situation appeared were 2017 and 2018. The appearance of Grade 6 sea situation in these two years was affected by extratropical cyclones. There is no obvious correlation between wave height and period. The process of rough sea along the Qinhuangdao coast is mainly affected by cold air, extratropical cyclone, and the combination of cold air and extratropical cyclone. The increase of wave height in October and November is mainly related to cold air.

  • [1]
    冯士筰, 李凤歧, 李少菁. 海洋科学导论[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.
    [2]
    俞聿修, 柳淑学. 海浪的现场观测及其统计特性[J]. 港工技术, 1994 (3): 1-11.
    [3]
    叶雨颖, 潘伟然, 张国荣, 等. 福建东山湾海浪现场观测的统计特征[J]. 厦门大学学报:自然科学版, 2007, 46(3): 386-389.
    [4]
    乔方利. 中国区域海洋学——物理海洋学[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社, 2012.
    [5]
    李 朝, 侯一筠, 李水清, 等. 两类典型台风路径影响下的黄、渤海海浪场特征研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2021, 52(1): 51-65. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20200300089
    [6]
    张 薇, 高 山, 訚忠辉, 等. 渤海灾害性海浪特征分析[J]. 海洋预报, 2012, 29(5): 73-77.
    [7]
    殷玉齐, 侯一筠, 冯兴如, 等. 汕尾市引发灾害性海浪的热带气旋特征研究[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2021, 52(1): 66-74. doi: 10.11693/hyhz20200600175
    [8]
    陶爱峰, 沈至淳, 李 硕, 等. 中国灾害性海浪研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2018, 36(14): 26-34.
    [9]
    GB/T 14914.2-2019, 海洋观测规范 第2部分: 海滨观测[S].
    [10]
    苏 梦, 潘国涛, 陈海涛, 等. 龙口海洋站海浪特征的统计分析[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2020, 42(1): 43-49. doi: 10.13984/j.cnki.cn37-1141.2020.01.006
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 张继鹏, 辛运胜. 水面舰船储弹机构传动系统动力学分析. 兵工自动化. 2025(06)
    2. 姚日升,涂小萍,徐蓉,周凯,缪群,肖王星,蒋璐璐. 基于浮标观测和ERA5资料的浙江沿海海浪特征分析. 海洋预报. 2024(05): 34-43 .
    3. 庄晓珊,胡俊洋,张一聪,邢闯. 大鹏湾近岸海域波浪观测特征分析. 海洋环境科学. 2023(03): 378-386 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (747) PDF downloads (87) Cited by(3)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return