• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • ISSN 1007-6336
  • CN 21-1168/X
Volume 40 Issue 3
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
CHEN Xue-chu, DAI Yu-hang, SUN Yan-wei, HE Xiao-yan, LI Hui. Research progress and prospect of eco-realignment and restoration technologies for metropolitan coastal zone[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 40(3): 477-484. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200097
Citation: CHEN Xue-chu, DAI Yu-hang, SUN Yan-wei, HE Xiao-yan, LI Hui. Research progress and prospect of eco-realignment and restoration technologies for metropolitan coastal zone[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 40(3): 477-484. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200097
shu

Research progress and prospect of eco-realignment and restoration technologies for metropolitan coastal zone

  • 1.

    School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Urban Ecology and Sustainability, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

  • 2.

    Technology Innovation Center for Land Spatial Eco-restoration in Metropolitan Area, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shanghai 200062, China

  • 3.

    Shanghai Water Way Engineering Design and Consulting Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China

  • 4.

    Shanghai Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Shanghai 200003, China

  • 5.

    Shanghai Administration Center for Ocean Affairs, Shanghai 200050, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 19, 2020
  • Revised Date: August 02, 2020
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract

  • Coastal regions as well as its ecosystem service now are under threaten by the combination effects of improper human activities and serious natural disasters. Restoring the damaged areas together with its services is both an opportunity and a challenge for coastal cities. Here, we summarized the representative coastal eco-realignment and restoration technologies including shorelines planting, sediment amendment and beach nourishment, hydrological control, marsh transplantation, and oyster reef construction. Moreover, we prospected the trends of coastal eco-realignment and restoration technologies, and suggested that studies should focuses on developing technologies that combining both human intervention and natural succession, in order to adapt to the harsh conditions at the coast. These technologies should also help to improve the function and structure of coastal ecosystems and to further form the landscape-scale composite ecosystems, which in turn improved the coastal environment and provided citizens with a beautiful habitat that could touch and explore the ocean.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (56)
  • [1]
    MA Z J, MELVILLE D S, LIU J G, et al. Rethinking China's new great wall[J]. Science, 2014, 346(6212): 912-914. doi: 10.1126/science.1257258
    [2]
    BI X L, LIU F Q, PAN X B. Coastal projects in China: from reclamation to restoration[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(9): 4691-4692.
    [3]
    LIU D Y, KEESING J K, HE P M, et al. The world's largest macroalgal bloom in the Yellow Sea, China: Formation and implications[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2013, 129: 2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.05.021
    [4]
    BULLERI F, CHAPMAN M G. The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 47(1): 26-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01751.x
    [5]
    陈雪初, 高如峰, 黄晓琛, 等. 欧美国家盐沼湿地生态恢复的基本观点、技术手段与工程实践进展[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2016, 35(3): 467-472.
    [6]
    GRENIER J L, DAVIS J A. Water quality in South San Francisco Bay, California: Current condition and potential issues for the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project[M]. New York: Springer, 2010: 115-147.
    [7]
    LIU Z Z, CUI B S, HE Q. Shifting paradigms in coastal restoration: six decades' lessons from China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566/567: 205-214. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.049
    [8]
    张明慧, 孙昭晨, 梁书秀, 等. 海岸整治修复国内外研究进展与展望[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2017, 36(4): 635-640.
    [9]
    FRENCH P W. Managed realignment-the developing story of a comparatively new approach to soft engineering[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2006, 67(3): 409-423. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.035
    [10]
    TEMMERMAN S, MEIRE P, BOUMA T J, et al. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change[J]. Nature, 2013, 504(7478): 79-83. doi: 10.1038/nature12859
    [11]
    BROWNE M A, CHAPMAN M G. Ecologically informed engineering reduces loss of intertidal biodiversity on artificial shorelines[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(19): 8204-8207.
    [12]
    STRAIN E M A, MORRIS R L, COLEMAN R A, et al. Increasing microhabitat complexity on seawalls can reduce fish predation on native oysters[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 120: 637-644. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.030
    [13]
    DYSON K, YOCOM K. Ecological design for urban waterfronts[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2015, 18(1): 189-208. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0385-9
    [14]
    WALTHAM N J, SHEAVES M. Eco-engineering rock pools to a seawall in a tropical estuary: Microhabitat features and fine sediment accumulation[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2018, 120: 631-636. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.010
    [15]
    CHAPMAN M G, BLOCKLEY D J. Engineering novel habitats on urban infrastructure to increase intertidal biodiversity[J]. Oecologia, 2009, 161(3): 625-635. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1393-y
    [16]
    严 飞, 董学刚. 长江口炮台湾湿地公园生态景观型海堤设计[J]. 人民长江, 2012, 43(S1): 7-10.
    [17]
    MARCUS L. Restoring tidal wetlands at Sonoma Baylands, San Francisco Bay, California[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2000, 15(3/4): 373-383.
    [18]
    WOOD S E, WHITE J R, ARMBRUSTER C K. Microbial processes linked to soil organic matter in a restored and natural coastal wetland in Barataria Bay, Louisiana[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 106: 507-514. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.06.028
    [19]
    黄华梅, 高 杨, 王银霞, 等. 疏浚泥用于滨海湿地生态工程现状及在我国应用潜力[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(8): 2571-2580.
    [20]
    孙芹芹, 杨顺良, 赵东波, 等. 不同疏浚方案下的安海湾整治修复效益评估[J]. 应用海洋学学报, 2015, 34(2): 241-246. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.2095-4972.2015.02.013
    [21]
    BOARD M. Beach nourishment and protection[M]. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 1995.
    [22]
    王广禄, 蔡 锋, 曹惠美, 等. 厦门香山至长尾礁沙滩修复实践及理论探讨[J]. 海洋工程, 2009, 27(3): 66-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9865.2009.03.010
    [23]
    谢亚琼, 刘松涛, 刘冀闽, 等. 秦皇岛金梦海湾海滩生态修复设计[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2013, 29(2): 79-86.
    [24]
    GONZÁLEZ M, MEDINA R, LOSADA M. On the design of beach nourishment projects using static equilibrium concepts: application to the Spanish coast[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2010, 57(2): 227-240. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.10.009
    [25]
    刘大为, 王铭晗, 宫晓健, 等. 荷兰人工育滩工程Sand Motor的经验与启示[J]. 海洋开发与管理, 2017, 34(6): 61-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9857.2017.06.012
    [26]
    VAN PROOSDIJ D, LUNDHOLM J, NEATT N, et al. Ecological re-engineering of a freshwater impoundment for salt marsh restoration in a hypertidal system[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2010, 36(10): 1314-1332. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.008
    [27]
    WEISHAR L L, TEAL J M, HINKLE R. Designing large-scale wetland restoration for Delaware Bay[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005, 25(3): 231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.04.012
    [28]
    MASSELINK G, HANLEY M E, HALWYN A C, et al. Evaluation of salt marsh restoration by means of self-regulating tidal gate – Avon estuary, South Devon, UK[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 106: 174-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.038
    [29]
    JACOBS S, BEAUCHARD O, STRUYF E, et al. Restoration of tidal freshwater vegetation using controlled reduced tide (CRT) along the Schelde Estuary (Belgium)[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2009, 85(3): 368-376. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.09.004
    [30]
    陈雪初, 戴雅奇, 黄超杰, 等. 上海鹦鹉洲湿地水质复合生态净化系统设计[J]. 中国给水排水, 2017, 33(20): 66-69.
    [31]
    汤臣栋. 上海崇明东滩互花米草生态控制与鸟类栖息地优化工程[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2016, 12(3): 4-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2016.03.01
    [32]
    WARREN R S, FELL P E, ROZSA R, et al. Salt marsh restoration in Connecticut: 20 years of science and management[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2002, 10(3): 497-513. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.01031.x
    [33]
    胡忠健, 马 强, 曹浩冰, 等. 长江口滨海湿地原生海三棱藨草种群恢复的实验研究[J]. 生态科学, 2016, 35(5): 1-7.
    [34]
    ZHOU C F, QIN P, XIE M. Vegetating coastal areas of east China: species selection, seedling cloning and transplantation[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2003, 20(4): 275-286. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(03)00030-2
    [35]
    SILLIMAN B R, SCHRACK E, HE Q, et al. Facilitation shifts paradigms and can amplify coastal restoration efforts[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(46): 14295-14300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515297112
    [36]
    DUGGAN-EDWARDS M F, PAGÈS J F, JENKINS S R, et al. External conditions drive optimal planting configurations for salt marsh restoration[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 57(3): 619-629. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13550
    [37]
    隋皓辰, 马 旭, 闫家国, 等. 滨海湿地盐沼植被修复中的种子产品制作过程及其有效性[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(12): 2601-2614.
    [38]
    KENT C P S. A comparison of Riley encased methodology and traditional techniques for planting red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle)[J]. Mangroves and Salt Marshes, 1999, 3(4): 215-225. doi: 10.1023/A:1009994725133
    [39]
    MORRIS R L, BILKOVIC D M, BOSWELL M K, et al. The application of oyster reefs in shoreline protection: are we over-engineering for an ecosystem engineer?[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 56(7): 1703-1711. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13390
    [40]
    BORSJE B W, VAN WESENBEECK B K, DEKKER F, et al. How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37(2): 113-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.027
    [41]
    LV W W, HUANG Y H, LIU Z Q, et al. Application of macrobenthic diversity to estimate ecological health of artificial oyster reef in Yangtze Estuary, China[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2016, 103(1/2): 137-143.
    [42]
    全为民, 沈新强, 罗民波, 等. 河口地区牡蛎礁的生态功能及恢复措施[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(10): 1234-1239. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2006.10.016
    [43]
    SCYPHERS S B, POWERS S P, HECK K L, et al. Oyster reefs as natural breakwaters mitigate shoreline loss and facilitate fisheries[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(8): e22396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022396
    [44]
    CHOWDHURY M S N, WALLES B, SHARIFUZZAMAN S M, et al. Oyster breakwater reefs promote adjacent mudflat stability and salt marsh growth in a monsoon dominated subtropical coast[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 8549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44925-6
    [45]
    PIAZZA B P, BANKS P D, LA PEYRE M K. The potential for created oyster shell reefs as a sustainable shoreline protection strategy in Louisiana[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2005, 13(3): 499-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00062.x
    [46]
    SCHOONEES T, GIJÓN MANCHEÑO A, SCHERES B, et al. Hard structures for coastal protection, towards greener designs[J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2019, 42(7): 1709-1729. doi: 10.1007/s12237-019-00551-z
    [47]
    O'DONNELL J E D. Living shorelines: a review of literature relevant to New England coasts[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2017, 33(2): 435-451.
    [48]
    CHEN X C, HUANG Y Y, YANG H L, et al. Restoring wetlands outside of the seawalls and to provide clean water habitat[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 721: 137788. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137788
    [49]
    REZAIE A M, LOERZEL J, FERREIRA C M. Valuing natural habitats for enhancing coastal resilience: wetlands reduce property damage from storm surge and sea level rise[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(1): e0226275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226275
    [50]
    DAS S, VINCENT J R. Mangroves protected villages and reduced death toll during Indian super cyclone[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(18): 7357-7360. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810440106
    [51]
    GITTMAN R K, POPOWICH A M, BRUNO J F, et al. Marshes with and without sills protect estuarine shorelines from erosion better than bulkheads during a Category 1 hurricane[J]. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2014, 102: 94-102.
    [52]
    WANG F M, LU X L, SANDERS C J, et al. Author correction: tidal wetland resilience to sea level rise increases their carbon sequestration capacity in United States[J]. Nature Communications, 2019, 10(1): 5733. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13800-3
    [53]
    YANG H L, TANG J W, ZHANG C S, et al. Enhanced carbon uptake and reduced methane emissions in a newly restored wetland[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2020, 125(1): e2019JG005222.
    [54]
    唐剑武, 叶属峰, 陈雪初, 等. 海岸带蓝碳的科学概念、研究方法以及在生态恢复中的应用[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2018, 48(6): 661-670.
    [55]
    文超祥, 刘健枭. 基于陆海统筹的海岸带空间规划研究综述与展望[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(7): 5-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2019.07.001
    [56]
    俞孔坚, 凌世红, 刘向军, 等. 再生设计 秦皇岛海滨景观带生态修复工程[J]. 风景园林, 2010, (3): 80-84.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Yiming, SUN Deyong, WANG Shengqiang, HE Miao, CHEN Ying, ZHANG Hailong, ZHANG Yue. Spatiotemporal variations of nutrients in Jiangsu coastal waters based on GOCI observations[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 43(5): 766-775. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.2023-x-0328
    [2]WU Yi-fan, ZHANG Yi-fei, FANG Xin, LIAN Ping-ting, LV Xin. Ecological restoration effect evaluation of artificial reefs with choquet integral algorithom[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(3): 467-473. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.2021-0093
    [3]TIAN Li-na, YANG Jin-sheng, ZHOU You-lin, CAO Rui, ZHANG Meng, PAN Yu-ying. The primary study on antioxidase activities of Boleophthalmus pectinirostris exposed to crude oil in intertidal zone[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(1): 135-141. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200170
    [4]YU Xiao-qin, MA Yun-rui, YU Jing. Evaluation of coastal ecological restoration policy effect based on entropy-weight TOPSIS Model in Shandong province[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 41(1): 74-79. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200168
    [5]LIU Hong-yan, LI Kai-qiang, KANG Bo-lun, QIN Hai-hua. Fe(Ⅲ) reduction and hydrogen production by Fe (Ⅲ)-reducing bacterium Enterococcus sp. ZQ21[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 40(3): 379-383. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200119
    [6]WEI Hai-feng, TIAN Shan-chuan, ZHAO Xiao-yi, LIU Chang-fa, ZHOU Ji-ti. Study on the bioaccumulation kinetics of three PAHs by Apostichopus japonicus[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 38(5): 663-668. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes20190503
    [7]WANG Hong-yu, FENG Rui-qi, LIU Hong-yan. Characterization of cell growth and bioflocculant production by Enterococcus sp.Y025 using macro-algae Laminaria japonica[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 37(3): 338-342. DOI: 10.12111/j.cnki.mes20180304
    [8]GU Jie, LI Zheng-yao, MAO Xiao-dan, HU Cheng-fei, KUANG Cui-ping, ZHANG Wan-lei. Study of COD environmental capacity in coastal waters of Beidaihe in summer[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(5): 682-687. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170507
    [9]ZHANG Xin-xin, YIN Yue, DUAN Mei-na, WANG Chao, XIONG De-qi. Effect of bioremediation dispersant and 180# fuel oil on CAT and SOD in Glyptocidaris crenularis[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 36(2): 284-290. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20170220
    [10]QIAO Ling, ZHEN Yu, MI Tie-Zhu. Review of the brown tides caused by Aureococcus anophagefferens[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2016, 35(3): 473-480. DOI: 10.13634/j.cnki.mes20160324

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(21)

    1. 陈雪初，孙彦伟，温泉，王军，叶属峰. 陆海统筹生态保护修复的生态学基础、难点问题与对策建议. 应用海洋学学报. 2025(01): 21-28 .
    2. 李相逸，刘育辰，赵九州，范雅婷. 深圳西部海岸带生态保护和修复策略研究. 住区. 2024(01): 100-109 .
    3. 戚洪帅，曾舒婷，陈敏，蔡锋，梁丙臣，柳莎莎. 海滩养护对海滩生态系统的多尺度影响述评. 海洋学报. 2024(01): 12-26 .
    4. 王沁怡，张生乐，张伯伦，周志杰，何培民，方淑波. 木霉菌和复合微生物制剂在海三棱藨草湿地修复中的应用研究. 海洋湖沼通报. 2024(02): 116-124 .
    5. 苗飞虎，杨凌晨. 基于生态重构的海南乐东中灶湾海岸带生态系统修复技术研究与实践. 园林. 2024(06): 41-50 .
    6. 盖美，徐晶晶. 海岸带韧性研究进展与融合人地系统思维的新思考. 海洋经济. 2024(06): 42-55 .
    7. 栾绍伦，林浩. 石岛湾海岸带保护修复技术方案探究. 中国航海. 2024(S1): 244-250 .
    8. 杨波，孙晓峰，刘昱，张磊，韩祯，郭世麒，李小艳，付辉，刘妍. 2022年海岸带生态修复科技热点回眸. 科技导报. 2023(01): 249-260 .
    9. 陈崇贤，禹舜尧，李志雄，刘京一. 海岸带韧性景观理论与实践研究进展. 风景园林. 2023(05): 19-27 .
    10. 张亚，张鹏，张庆华，彭卫平. 海岸带生态修复技术研究——以广州市虎门大桥(北侧)海岸带为例. 甘肃科学学报. 2023(05): 1-7 .
    11. 翟法. 侵蚀性海岸带生态保护修复实践. 水利规划与设计. 2023(11): 139-145 .
    12. 谭泽琼，林楚彬，贺仕昌，娄全胜. 海口铺前湾岸滩冲淤演变分析. 海洋技术学报. 2023(06): 78-86 .
    13. 王明利. 构建与区域发展相协同的渤海综合治理长效机制. 宏观经济管理. 2022(02): 14-20+28 .
    14. 张洁，陈国光，王尚晓，牛晓楠，帅爽，陈思，于俊杰，曹新晴. 福建省沿海砂质岸线防护林分布特征及生态修复探讨. 华东地质. 2022(01): 72-78 .
    15. 荆贝贝，杜安. 上海城市绿色空间碳汇评估及提升策略. 中国国土资源经济. 2022(04): 64-72 .
    16. 张妙，徐力波，严婧，刘博远，陈雪初. 滨海生态廊道构建指标体系研究——以杭州湾北岸上海段为例. 海洋开发与管理. 2022(09): 11-16 .
    17. 刘小丁，唐力明，李伊黎，许敏端，康昕怡，孙端，李宇宸，肖红，赵耀龙，陈伟莲，吕凤涛. 基于知识图谱的近30年国际海岸带研究进展与热点分析. 测绘通报. 2022(12): 153-159 .
    18. 戴雅奇，陆金忠，陈雪初. 海岸带侵蚀岸段湿地恢复设计及运行成效分析——以杭州湾北岸奉贤段为例. 园林. 2021(08): 20-24 .
    19. 康濒月，李妹洋，李洪远. NbS在海岸带蓝碳生态系统修复中的案例研究. 景观设计. 2021(04): 10-15 .
    20. 宋爽，郭丽峰，张辉，张浩. 流域-河口-近岸海域污染防治机制研究. 海洋环境科学. 2021(06): 838-842 . 本站查看
    21. 关骁倢，鞠茂伟，陈兆林，孙丽艳，王薇. 渤海围填海历史遗留问题处理的实践经验启示——以大连金普新区为例. 海洋环境科学. 2021(06): 965-969 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(9)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2098) PDF downloads (63) Cited by(30)
    Related

    Copyright © 2012 《海洋环境科学》编辑部   辽ICP备05008008号-2

    Address:辽宁省大连市沙河口区凌河街42号 (116023)     Tel：0411-84783126    E-mail：hyhjkx@vip.126.com

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  support: info@rhhz.net Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return