• 中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • ISSN 1007-6336
  • CN 21-1168/X
HOU Tian-qi, WANG Shan-shan, CHEN Hong-ju, ZHUANG Yun-yun, LIU Guang-xing, WANG Ning. Characterization and comparison of phytoplankton community structure in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea in summer 2013[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 40(4): 591-600. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200069
Citation: HOU Tian-qi, WANG Shan-shan, CHEN Hong-ju, ZHUANG Yun-yun, LIU Guang-xing, WANG Ning. Characterization and comparison of phytoplankton community structure in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea in summer 2013[J]. Chinese Journal of MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 40(4): 591-600. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20200069

Characterization and comparison of phytoplankton community structure in the Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea in summer 2013

More Information
  • Received Date: March 19, 2020
  • Revised Date: May 23, 2020
  • To compare the phytoplankton community of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea, we collected water samples from 50 stations (31.19 °N-39.82 °N, 118.89 °E-125.65 °E) in the Bohai Sea (BS), North Yellow Sea (NYS) and South Yellow Sea (SYS) in the summer of 2013, and characterized the phytoplankton community structure by studying the species composition, abundance, dominant species and diversity. The results showed that the highest species number and Shannon-Wiener diversity index were detected in SYS, followed by NYS and BS. High diversity index regions were distributed on the south sea area of Shandong Peninsula, the central area of NYS and the adjoining waters of the Yangtze River. Phytoplankton abundance throughout the water column was in the range of 0.01×103~418.2×103 cells/L, and the average abundance of the BS, NYS and SYS were (14.6±12.8) ×103 cells/L, (11.5±14.9) ×103 cells/L and (35.7±92.3) ×103 cells/L, respectively. The phytoplankton assemblages were mainly comprised of Dinophyta and Bacillariophyta. Dinophyta accounted for 46.6%, 73.1% and 22.1% of water column phytoplankton abundance and Bacillariophyta accounted for 46.6%, 73.1% and 22.1% in the BS, NYS and SYS, respectively. Phytoplankton of the BS and SYS were mainly distributed in the surface and subsurface layer while that of the NYS were mainly distributed in the middle to bottom layer.

  • [1]
    FEHLING J, DAVIDSON K, BOLCH C J S, et al. The relationship between phytoplankton distribution and water column characteristics in North West European Shelf Sea Waters[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(3): e340983.
    [2]
    CHASSOT E, BONHOMMEAU S, DULVY N K, et al. Global marine primary production constrains fisheries catches[J]. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13(4): 495-505. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01443.x
    [3]
    李清雪, 陶建华. 应用浮游植物群落结构指数评价海域富营养化[J]. 中国环境科学, 1999, 19(6): 548-551. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.1999.06.017
    [4]
    俞建銮, 李瑞香. 渤海、黄海浮游植物生态的研究[J]. 黄渤海海洋, 1993, 11(3): 52-59.
    [5]
    孙 军, 刘东艳, 柴心玉, 等. 1998—1999年春秋季渤海中部及其邻近海域叶绿素a浓度及初级生产力估算[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(3): 517-526. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2003.03.016
    [6]
    田 伟, 孙 军. 2009年晚春黄海南部浮游植物群落[J]. 海洋科学, 2011, 35(6): 19-24.
    [7]
    张翠霞, 陈 婷, 黄 晓, 等. 2011年夏季北黄海浮游植物群落[J]. 海洋湖沼通报, 2014, (1): 81-93.
    [8]
    吕末晓, 栾青杉, 彭 亮, 等. 2014年夏黄海浮游植物群集及其对物理过程的响应[J]. 海洋科学进展, 2016, 34(1): 70-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6647.2016.01.007
    [9]
    刘述锡, 樊景凤, 王真良. 北黄海浮游植物群落季节变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(7): 1173-1181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2013.07.014
    [10]
    栾青杉, 康元德, 王 俊. 渤海浮游植物群落的长期变化(1959—2015)[J]. 渔业科学进展, 2018, 39(4): 9-18.
    [11]
    GB/T 12763.6-2007, 海洋调查规范第6部分: 海洋生物调查[S].
    [12]
    SHANNON C E, WEAVER W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication[M]. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1949: 125.
    [13]
    郭术津, 孙 军, 张 辉, 等. 2011年秋季北黄海浮游植物群落[J]. 天津科技大学学报, 2013, 28(1): 22-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6510.2013.01.008
    [14]
    苑明莉, 孙 军, 翟惟东. 2012年秋季渤海和北黄海浮游植物群落[J]. 天津科技大学学报, 2014, 29(6): 56-64.
    [15]
    郭术津, 李彦翘, 张翠霞, 等. 渤海浮游植物群落结构及与环境因子的相关性分析[J]. 海洋通报, 2014, 33(1): 95-105. doi: 10.11840/j.issn.1001-6392.2014.01.013
    [16]
    李振华, 周永东, 张亚洲, 等. 2014年春季舟山海域浮游植物群落特征[J]. 浙江海洋大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 37(5): 405-411.
    [17]
    韦钦胜, 于志刚, 冉祥滨, 等. 黄海西部沿岸流系特征分析及其对物质输运的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(2): 145-156.
    [18]
    纪昱彤, 王 宁, 陈洪举, 等. 2013年秋季渤黄海浮游植物的群落特征[J]. 中国海洋大学学报, 2018, 48(S2): 31-41.
    [19]
    赵其彪, 孙 军, 李 丹, 等. 东海低氧区及邻近水域浮游植物的季节变化[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(7): 2366-2379.
    [20]
    DENARDOU-QUENEHERVE A, GRZEBYK D, POUCHUS Y F, et al. Toxicity of French strains of the dinoflagellate Prorocentrum minimum experimental and natural contaminations of mussels[J]. Toxicon, 1999, 37(12): 1711-1719. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(99)00113-0
    [21]
    PETRICIOLI D, BAKRAN-PETRICIOLI T, VILIČIČ D, et al. Freshwater phytoplankton bloom in Visovac lake-A possible cause of benthic mortality in Krka estuary (Adriatic sea, Croatia)[J]. Marine Ecology, 1996, 17(1/2/3): 373-382.
    [22]
    HY/T 069-2005, 赤潮监测技术规程[S].
    [23]
    王金辉, 黄秀清. 具齿原甲藻的生态特征及赤潮成因浅析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(7): 1065-1069. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2003.07.007
    [24]
    张青田. 中国海域赤潮发生趋势的年际变化[J]. 中国环境监测, 2013, 29(5): 98-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6002.2013.05.019
    [25]
    余立华, 李道季, 方 涛, 等. 三峡水库蓄水前后长江口水域夏季硅酸盐、溶解无机氮分布及硅氮比值的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(9): 2817-2826. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.09.006
    [26]
    李瑞香, 朱明远, 陈 尚, 等. 围隔生态系内浮游植物对富磷的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(4): 603-607. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2001.04.015
    [27]
    苏纪兰, 黄大吉. 黄海冷水团的环流结构[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1995, 26(5): 1-7.
    [28]
    王保栋. 黄海冷水域生源要素的变化特征及相互关系[J]. 海洋学报, 2000, 22(6): 47-54.
    [29]
    傅明珠, 孙 萍, 王宗灵, 等. 黄海冷水团水域浮游植物群落粒级结构的季节变化[J]. 海洋学报, 2010, 32(1): 120-129.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 李亚倩,张倩,杨世民. 2021年渤海浮游植物群落结构及其季节性变化. 海洋科学进展. 2024(02): 337-348 .
    2. 朱旭宇,葛跃浩,杨波,丁言者,贲成恺,肖悦悦,张虎. 浒苔防控期间辐射沙洲绿潮分布区浮游植物群落现状. 海洋湖沼通报(中英文). 2024(05): 146-154 .
    3. 陈楠生,丁翔翔,崔宗梅. 山东近海赤潮物种多样性研究进展. 海洋与湖沼. 2023(05): 1258-1273 .
    4. 杨欣兰,潘瑛子,何文佳,扎西拉姆,刘飞. 西藏哲古错水源河流夏季浮游植物群落特征差异及其与水环境的关系. 西藏农业科技. 2022(04): 47-54 .

    Other cited types(5)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1817) PDF downloads (36) Cited by(9)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return